WQ3 Dedicated
A private environment for WQ3 that we plan with you around your requirements.
Industries
WQ3 for banking
Account, credit and internal approval documents signed in order with a complete audit trail.
Considerations
Integration with core and ERP systems.
Strong signer assurance.
Dedicated deployment options.
Related
API
A REST API to create documents, add signers, send for signature and download signed copies.
Security
How WQ3 protects documents through the signing workflow.
Common documents
Account opening forms
Prepared, sent and signed entirely in WQ3.
Financing contracts
Prepared, sent and signed entirely in WQ3.
Customer mandates
Prepared, sent and signed entirely in WQ3.
How WQ3 helps
Ready templates
Standard banking forms with eKYC account verification.
Live tracking
See who signed and who is late, with automatic reminders.
Legal proof
A timestamp, document fingerprint and completion certificate for every document, aligned with Law 15 of 2004.
Match signing levels to transaction roles
Start with a signing policy that connects the bank’s requirements to each participant’s role and the document’s purpose. WQ3 offers exactly three levels: electronic signature, remote signing and token signing, with different levels available for signers on the same document.
For banking workflows, consider electronic signatures for everyday agreements and remote or token signing for formal or high-value contracts. The choice should follow the bank’s legal and risk review rather than transaction value alone.
Keep identity and signing authority separate in that review. Verifying an account holder does not, by itself, establish authority to bind a company or act for a customer, so check the relevant mandate before sending.
Separate account verification from banking due diligence
WQ3’s eKYC capability is an account-verification add-on, not a fourth signing level. An eKYC-verified account can be required with any of the three levels when the workflow calls for proof of the signer’s identity.
Banks should define where this check fits within their broader onboarding process. It should not be treated as a replacement for the bank’s anti-money-laundering checks, beneficial ownership review, credit assessment or other due-diligence procedures.
Before sending, identify the person expected to sign, the capacity in which they are acting and whether account verification is required. Keeping these decisions distinct helps teams avoid treating a verified account as evidence that the entire banking relationship has been approved.
Review the document pack before sending
Review the final version and all required attachments before issuing signing invitations: WQ3 locks documents once they are sent. This makes pre-send review the appropriate point for resolving legal and commercial changes rather than expecting to edit content during signing.
For a financing pack or customer instruction, that review should cover consistent names, amounts, references and signing capacities. Confirm that the participant list reflects the intended transaction and that responsibility for releasing the pack is clear within the bank.
Each signer receives an individual invitation, while roles and permissions support access control. When planning the process, review what each participant needs to see and establish an internal correction procedure for errors discovered after sending.
Plan for verification after completion
Plan to retain the final signed file and completion certificate together in the appropriate banking record. This gives reviewers a defined reference when questions arise later about the version used or the people who signed.
WQ3’s public check page allows verification without an account through a QR code or reference. It shows signer names, signature levels and step timestamps, and compares the file’s SHA-256 fingerprint with the stored fingerprint to reveal changes.
Use that evidence alongside the bank’s approval file and supporting records. Document integrity does not itself establish correct commercial terms or complete regulatory compliance; legal validity under Egyptian Law No. 15 of 2004 also depends on meeting its applicable conditions.
Explore more
Related pages
WQ3 for government
Digital approval and signing workflows for public entities, with private deployment options.
Learn moreWQ3 for healthcare
Staff contracts, supplier agreements and internal approvals for healthcare organizations.
Learn moreWQ3 for real estate
Lease agreements, sales contracts and handover documents signed by every party remotely.
Learn moreWQ3 for financial services
Client agreements and internal approvals for financing, investment and payment companies.
Learn moreWQ3 for insurance
Policy documents, claim forms and broker agreements signed remotely by customers and partners.
Learn moreWQ3 for construction
Subcontractor agreements, variation orders and site handovers signed without waiting on paper.
Learn moreStart your first signing journey today.
Create your WQ3 account, or talk to us about your organization’s requirements.
Frequently asked questions
Can a customer and bank representative use different signing levels?+
Yes. WQ3 allows a different level for each signer on the same document. Choose by role, following bank policy and legal review.
Does eKYC replace the bank’s KYC process?+
It should not be treated as a replacement. It verifies the account holder’s identity, rather than providing a complete banking due-diligence process.
When should document review be completed?+
Before sending, because documents are locked once sent. Check content, attachments, participants and signing capacities before issuing invitations.
Does a reviewer need an account to verify a document?+
No account is needed for WQ3’s public check page, accessible through the QR code or reference.
Does a particular signing level guarantee legal acceptance?+
No. WQ3 is aligned with Egyptian Law No. 15 of 2004, but legal effect depends on applicable conditions, not the level’s name alone.