We review it
Your request goes to the right team based on the topic you chose.
The WQ3 team reviews your message and replies by email as soon as possible on business days.
Your request goes to the right team based on the topic you chose.
We reply by email or phone to understand your needs and agree the next step.
A quote, a walkthrough session or an integration plan, depending on your request.
The kind of documents you sign, roughly how many users, the systems you want to connect, and any legal or security requirements your organisation has.
Choose one signing process where questions recur or progress is difficult to track, then identify what your team needs to understand before deciding. Your central question might concern signer access, detecting changes, or reviewing what happened after signing was completed.
Prepare a sample with unnecessary personal and confidential business information removed. Keep the parties and roles representative of the real process, so the discussion helps you assess a familiar task rather than simply watch a general product overview.
Use the demo discussion to compare WQ3’s three levels: electronic signature, remote signing and token signing. Different signers can have different levels within the same document, so you do not need to assume that every participant requires an identical approach.
Ask how each level fits your document, including any formal requirements or need for a digital certificate. Discuss eKYC separately: it is an account-verification add-on that can accompany any level, not a fourth signing level. Separating these questions helps clarify both identity requirements and signing requirements.
Look beyond the act of signing and ask to explore document access controls and the evidence available after completion. Useful review points include locking documents once sent, individual signer invitations, and the action record that accompanies the completion certificate.
Also discuss how a later reviewer can check the file’s authenticity. WQ3’s public check page supports verification without an account through a QR code and reference, while the SHA-256 fingerprint reveals file changes. Ask about the distinction between detecting a change, reviewing signer names and signature levels, and checking the timestamp of each step.
Identify questions for your process owner, legal team and security team beforehand, even if not everyone attends. The process owner can focus on signer access, legal reviewers on applicable validity conditions, and security reviewers on encryption, permissions and identity verification.
After the discussion, record what is clear and what still needs internal review. WQ3 is aligned with Egyptian E-Signature Law No. 15 of 2004, but legal recognition depends on meeting applicable conditions. Treat the demo as a practical fit assessment, not a substitute for legal review of your transaction.
Explore more
Plans, quotes and Enterprise, API or Dedicated pricing.
Learn moreOrganization-wide rollout, integration and deployment.
Learn moreAccess to the WQ3 API and embedded signing.
Learn moreResell, implement or integrate WQ3.
Learn moreAny other question.
Learn moreCreate your WQ3 account, or talk to us about your organization’s requirements.
You can prepare a sanitised sample showing the parties and signing process. Focus on the questions you want to assess without exposing unnecessary confidential information.
You need not settle that choice to prepare for the discussion. Identify your document requirements and ask to compare electronic signature, remote signing and token signing against them.
No. It verifies the account holder’s identity as an add-on and can accompany any of the three signing levels.
Ask about the audit trail, completion certificate, public document verification and how the file fingerprint detects changes.
No. Legal recognition depends on the conditions applicable to the transaction; ask your legal adviser to assess your documents and signing requirements.