Security

Documents are locked once sent.

Signer access is through individual invitations.

Every action is recorded.

A useful security review separates protection during transmission, detection of file changes and evidence of signer identity. These answer different questions; they are not interchangeable forms of proof. A protected connection alone does not establish that a file copy remained unchanged later, and a matching fingerprint alone does not establish that someone had authority to approve a contract.

Use WQ3’s evidence to answer the relevant question, alongside your organisation’s own authority and approval checks. Before sending, review the intended version, participants and required signing levels. After completion, review the integrity of the copy in hand and the signing record, rather than relying only on the appearance of a signature on the page.

Create a short review checklist for each document type before signing begins. Identify the required participants, their signing levels, whether account verification is needed and the evidence the final reviewer will require. This turns security requirements into explicit transaction decisions rather than an assumption that one configuration suits every contract.

For Egyptian transactions, WQ3 is aligned with E-Signature Law No. 15 of 2004 and its executive regulations; legal validity remains conditional on meeting the applicable requirements. Review those conditions alongside any sector-specific or organisational requirements, rather than treating technical safeguards as a blanket guarantee for every use. At internal handover, include the final file and completion certificate so reviewers have the signing evidence and its context.